Model comparison
Mixtral 8x22B vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSide by side
| Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 26.7 | — |
| Released | 2024-04-17 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 3.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1166 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 72% | — |
| MBPP+ | 64.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1150 | — |
| DTBench | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.3 | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1184 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 24.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 46% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 33.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1113 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
| MMLU | 77.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1128 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1116 | — |
| LMArena French | 1165 | — |
| LMArena German | 1141 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 72.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1147 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1144 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Mixtral 8x22B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1141 | — |
| WildBench | 71.1% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1130 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Mixtral 8x22B has enough public results to be ranked (#330); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.