Model comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | — | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-17 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| PIQA | 88.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| GSM8K | 88.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-MoE: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-MoE | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| BoolQ | 84.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-MoE better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-MoE and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-MoE has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.