Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Qwen3-1.7B

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small leads 31.0 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 47.5% for Mistral Small and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Mistral Small and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Mistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.426.6
Released2024-02-262025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked394

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
SciCode26.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
LMArena Coding1362—
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%—
ALE-Bench497.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%28.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1335—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
LiveBench44%—

Math Too close to call

Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%8.1%
LiveBench Math39.9%—
LMArena Math1341—
MATH Level 546.8%—

Knowledge Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond47.5%38%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1291—
MMLU68.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1315—
LMArena Chinese1340—
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1340—
LMArena Japanese1275—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1310—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1327—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1338—
LMArena Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1344—
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper