Model comparison

GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen3-1.7B

GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5 Nano OpenAI

33.5

Rank #241 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Nano scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Nano leads 35.9 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 81.1% for GPT-5 Nano and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
GPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.526.6
Released2025-08-072025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked494

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)34.8%—
WeirdML38.1%—
LMArena Coding1351—
ALE-Bench718.67—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5 Nano leads

GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard51.5%28.4%
Terminal-Bench21.8%—

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles27%0%
ARC-AGI-22.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark62.2%—
ARC-AGI-120.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1328—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA7.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.38—
ForecastBench59.1—

Math GPT-5 Nano leads

GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202581.1%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)20%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
ProofBench12%—
Omni-MATH54.6%—
LMArena Math1317—
MATH Level 595.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)8.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge GPT-5 Nano leads

GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond69.4%38%
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
MMLU-Pro77.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.5%—
GPQA (HELM)67.9%—
LMArena Expert1321—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Vision1159—
VPCT37.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1313—
LMArena Chinese1356—
LMArena German1327—
LMArena Japanese1226—
LMArena Korean1269—
LMArena Russian1296—
LMArena Spanish1360—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
IFEval93.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1306—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1312—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1320—
LMArena Creative Writing1249—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing705—
WildBench80.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1311—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 Nano better than Qwen3-1.7B?

GPT-5 Nano is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Nano and Qwen3-1.7B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Nano has 49 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper