Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 26.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 55.2% for MiniMax-M2.5 and 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-02-12 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1387 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 68.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1381 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 618.17 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 42.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -23.16 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 55.2% | 40.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.68 | 131.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 63.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | — |
Math Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| ProofBench | 4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1378 | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1393 | — |
| LMArena French | 1362 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1171 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 11.4% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.5 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1361 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Mistral Small 3.2?
MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.