Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 26.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 55.2% for MiniMax-M2.5 and 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index38.331.2
Released2026-02-122025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K256K
Max output131K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$0.25
Results tracked336

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
LMArena Coding1381—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%40.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68131.74
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1372—

Math Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30.3%
ProofBench4%—
LMArena Math1378—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—
LMArena Expert1379—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1338—
LMArena Chinese1393—
LMArena French1362—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Russian1358—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1353—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1366—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral Small 3.2
EQ-Bench Creative Writing13611255
LMArena Text1359—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
LMArena Multi-Turn1364—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Mistral Small 3.2?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax-M2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper