Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-30B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

30.8

Rank #271 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.5

Rank #174 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 41.7 to 26.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 70.3% for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.50 for Qwen3-30B-A3B.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 41K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.838.5
Released2025-06-202025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K41K
Max output16K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.50
Results tracked632

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%
LMArena Coding—1416

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%54.9%
Chess Puzzles1%8%
Epoch Capabilities Index131.73139.63
CritPt—0.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1398
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%70.3%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
LMArena Math—1394

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
GPQA Diamond49.1%70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%
LMArena Expert—1395

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1372
LMArena Chinese—1434
LMArena French—1419
LMArena German—1379
LMArena Japanese—1338
LMArena Korean—1333
LMArena Russian—1369
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1364

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text—1384
LMArena Creative Writing—1318
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1378

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-30B-A3B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3-30B-A3B lists at $0.12 and $0.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper