Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen2-72B

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2-72B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.7 to 21.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.230.0
Released2025-06-202024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked626

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LMArena Coding—1196
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74125.28
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LMArena Math—1235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond49.1%40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English—1176
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following—1181

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1192

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text—1203
LMArena Creative Writing—1181
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1196

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen2-72B?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2-72B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper