Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen2-72B
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2-72B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.7 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2 and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.74 | 125.28 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
Math Qwen2-72B leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen2-72B?
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2-72B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.