Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen2-72B
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2-72B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 27.4 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 125.28 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Qwen2-72B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1235 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 82% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen2-72B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1169 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1196 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen2-72B?
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2-72B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.