Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 34.1.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.233.0
Released2025-06-20—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding—1130

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1127
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74—

Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LMArena Math—1173

Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
LMArena Expert—1108

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1094
LMArena Chinese—1108
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1113

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1120

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1138
LMArena Creative Writing—1107
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper