Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Phi-1.5
Mistral Small 3.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | — |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 90.82 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Phi-1.5?
Mistral Small 3.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#271); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Phi-1.5 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.