Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.8 to 19.2.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
Math Too close to call
Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |
Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.