Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 25.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Step 3.7 Flash?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.
Which has the bigger context window?
Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.