Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mistral Nemo
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.3 to 28.6.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 25.9 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | 128K |
| Max output | 33K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Nemo does, with 128K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.