Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Mistral Nemo has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 14B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 38.2 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.9% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen2.5 14B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Mistral Nemo has enough public results to be ranked (#332); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 14B Instruct lists at $0.35 and $1.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.