Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Haiku Anthropic

25.9

Rank #340 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

38.7

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads 37.7 to 26.4.
  • Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.938.7
Released2024-03-072024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked373

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads

Claude 3 Haiku: 26.4 (#325), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: 37.7 (#191)

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct39.4%39.8%
BigCodeBench Complete50.1%52.2%
WeirdML9.8%—
LMArena Coding1199—
CadEval12%—
HumanEval+68.9%—
MBPP+68.8%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 16.3 (#307), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark34.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1174—
DTBench50.1%—
LMCA8.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.35—
ForecastBench53.2—
WinoGrande74.2%—

Math Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 9.8 (#319), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.8%—
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 17.3 (#285), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
MMLU73.8%79.9%
GPQA Diamond36.3%—
Confabulations34.2%—
LMArena Expert1148—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 23.6 (#128), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Vision950—
ScienceQA72%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.0 (#243), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1178—
LMArena Chinese1155—
LMArena French1195—
LMArena German1174—
LMArena Japanese1102—
LMArena Korean1109—
LMArena Russian1204—
LMArena Spanish1166—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 61.3 (#247), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1173—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 36.1 (#237), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1190—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 3 Haiku: 29.7 (#291), Qwen2.5 14B Instruct: —

BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuQwen2.5 14B Instruct
LMArena Text1195—
LMArena Creative Writing1157—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing717—
LMArena Multi-Turn1190—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Haiku better than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Claude 3 Haiku has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Claude 3 Haiku or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Haiku has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper