Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5-14B
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 29.8 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Qwen1.5-14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-14B leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.