Model comparison
Ministral 3B vs Qwen1.5-14B
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 29.8 to 10.4.
Side by side
| Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.2 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-01 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads
Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| DTBench | 51.7% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.1 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads
Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 25.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ministral 3B better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.