Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 35.0 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.