Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 36.1 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.