Model comparison

Mistral Medium vs o1-pro

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

o1-pro OpenAI

31.5

Rank #271 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and o1-pro in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.7 to 25.0.
  • Mistral Medium is cheaper at $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
  • Mistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium and o1-pro specifications
Mistral Mediumo1-pro
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Noometry Index36.331.5
Released2023-12-112025-03-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output262K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$150
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$600
Results tracked363

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), o1-pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
FrontierCode8%—
SciCode40.2%—
WeirdML43.7%—
LMArena Coding1434—
ALE-Bench763.98—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), o1-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.7%—

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
Kagi LLM Benchmark50%—
ARC-AGI-1—23.3%
CritPt0%—
EnigmaEval—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1426—
DTBench75.5%—
LMCA26.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%—

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), o1-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202532.2%—
ProofBench9%—
LMArena Math1408—
MATH Level 581.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge o1-pro leads

Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
Humanity's Last Exam4.5%8.1%
GPQA Diamond59.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate22.7%—
LMArena Expert1408—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), o1-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
LMArena Vision1172—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), o1-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
LMArena Non-English1408—
LMArena Chinese1447—
LMArena French1459—
LMArena German1432—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Russian1411—
LMArena Spanish1433—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), o1-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1398—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), o1-pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
LMArena Longer Query1406—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), o1-pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Mediumo1-pro
LMArena Text1424—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
Short-Story Creative Writing77.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium better than o1-pro?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium or o1-pro?

Mistral Medium is cheaper. It lists at $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and o1-pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper