Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs QwQ-32B

Mistral Medium 3.5 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.2 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and QwQ-32B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 50.6.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and QwQ-32B specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.239.8
Released—2024-11-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2236

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Coding14611333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
LMArena WebDev1264—
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning QwQ-32B leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14361325
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35137.6
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Math14311359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
LiveBench Math—77.8%

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Expert14321324
GPQA Diamond—65.3%
Confabulations—15.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), QwQ-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Vision1223—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English14041305
LMArena Chinese14421378
LMArena French14481336
LMArena German14511313
LMArena Korean13851279
LMArena Russian13951297
LMArena Spanish14091354
LMArena Japanese—1262

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14151297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query14151308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5QwQ-32B
LMArena Text14211329
LMArena Creative Writing13741288
LMArena Multi-Turn14231314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
EQ-Bench 4993—
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than QwQ-32B?

Mistral Medium 3.5 and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.2 vs 39.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.0 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and QwQ-32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper