Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3-4B
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 36.4 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 210K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.42 | — |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1222 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1443 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1414 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3-4B?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.