Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 16.6 to 10.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1 and 12.9% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 39.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 105K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1461 |
Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | 12.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.42 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1414 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1414 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1372 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1423 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.