Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen Plus
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 36.4 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 41.4% for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 210K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1263 | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1317 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.42 | — |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1222 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1443 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1303 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1414 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen Plus?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 5.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.