Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 51.9 to 43.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 41.4% for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index37.340.2
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding12681461
LMArena WebDev—1264

Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%41.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts12841436
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.35

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math12511431

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert12461432

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English12851404
LMArena Chinese13091442
LMArena French13301448
LMArena German13111451
LMArena Korean12591385
LMArena Russian12881395
LMArena Spanish13051409
LMArena Japanese1272—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following12551415

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query12761415

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text13061421
LMArena Creative Writing12871374
LMArena Multi-Turn12761423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper