Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 34.1.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.233.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14611130
LMArena WebDev1264—

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14361127
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14311173

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14321108

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1223—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14041094
LMArena Chinese14421108
LMArena French14481110
LMArena German14511101
LMArena Korean1385954
LMArena Russian13951145
LMArena Spanish14091095
LMArena Japanese—1042

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14151113

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14151120

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14211138
LMArena Creative Writing13741107
LMArena Multi-Turn14231088
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper