Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 40.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1431 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1432 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1415 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.