Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 39.3 to 18.0.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 29.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 210K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1263 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1461 | — |
Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 41.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 12.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.42 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1222 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1443 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1453 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1414 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.5 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1372 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 993 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.