Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 39.3 to 19.2.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index39.632.2
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14611210
LMArena WebDev1263—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14361208
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.42—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14321208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1431—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1222—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14051160
LMArena Chinese14431192
LMArena Russian13961187
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1453—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Spanish1406—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14141186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14141194

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14211218
LMArena Creative Writing13721199
LMArena Multi-Turn14231221
WildBench—73.4%
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper