Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 17.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 40.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1431 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1432 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1442 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1395 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1409 |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1415 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.