Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 8B
Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 8B leads 16.6 to 10.6.
- Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 105K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Qwen3 8B leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 8B?
Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 131K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.