Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 6.5% for Mistral Medium 3.1 and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 105K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.