Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 34.1.
  • Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Mistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderMistral AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.933.0
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window131K—
Max output105K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding—1130

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
NYT Connections (extended)6.5%—
Thematic Generalization20.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1127

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math—1173

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1108

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1094
LMArena Chinese—1108
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1113

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1120

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1138
LMArena Creative Writing—1107
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1476—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper