Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.