Model comparison
Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Large 4 leads 40.4 to 16.2.
- Mistral Large 4 is cheaper at $0.68 / $2.09 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.
- Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 262K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.68 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.09 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1475 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 27.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1488 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 20% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1424 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1429 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1424 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Large 4 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Mistral Large 4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.68 per million input tokens and $2.09 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 32B Instruct lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Mistral Large 4 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.