Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Mistral Large 4

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mistral Large 4 leads 22.5 to 6.8.
  • Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Mistral Large 4 specifications
Magistral SmallMistral Large 4
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index30.243.1
Released2025-06-102026-10-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output40K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.68
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$2.09
Results tracked1015

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
LMArena WebDev—1541
SciCode35.2%—
LMArena Coding—1475

Reasoning Mistral Large 4 leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—27.4%
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1444
DTBench61.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19—

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
LMArena Math—1488

Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
SimpleQA Verified—20%
LMArena Expert—1447

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
LMArena Non-English—1415
LMArena Chinese—1491
LMArena Russian—1414

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
LMArena Instruction Following—1424

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
LMArena Longer Query—1429

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallMistral Large 4
LMArena Text—1427
LMArena Creative Writing—1361
LMArena Multi-Turn—1424

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Small or Mistral Large 4?

Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.

Is Magistral Small or Mistral Large 4 better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Mistral Large 4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 4 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper