Model comparison

Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

39.1

Rank #176 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

34.3

Rank #232 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 15.2.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.75 for Mistral Large 3.

Side by side

Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Mistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.134.3
Released2025-12-022026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output8K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.75$0.80
Results tracked243

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena WebDev1230—
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
LMArena Coding1448—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
Kagi LLM Benchmark50.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)7.5%—
CritPt—0%
Thematic Generalization23%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1429—

Math Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Math1414—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.5%—
LMArena Expert1421—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Vision1221—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1413—
LMArena Chinese1447—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1437—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Russian1411—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1403—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1428—
LMArena Creative Writing1386—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1412—
LMArena Multi-Turn1429—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 3 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 lists at $0.25 and $0.75.

Is Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper