Model comparison

Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

39.1

Rank #176 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Large 3 leads 60.0 to 41.6.
  • Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
  • Mistral Large 3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Mistral Large 3 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Mistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.133.4
Released2025-12-022024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K33K
Max output8K29K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$0.66
Output $ / M tokens$0.75$1
Results tracked2431

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding14481276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
LMArena WebDev1230—
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14291251
Kagi LLM Benchmark50.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)7.5%—
Thematic Generalization23%—
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math14141251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert14211221
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Vision1221—

Multilingual Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English14131205
LMArena Chinese14471222
LMArena Russian14111228
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1437—
LMArena Japanese1394—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14031223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query14131251

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 3 leads

Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 3Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text14281230
LMArena Creative Writing13861174
LMArena Multi-Turn14291222
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1412—
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 3 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mistral Large 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

Is Mistral Large 3 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Mistral Large 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 3 does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 3 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper