Model comparison
Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 41.6.
Side by side
| Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1287 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1081 | — |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1276 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Molmo 2 8b | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.