Model comparison

Mistral 7B vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

23.0

Rank #351 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 8.1.
  • Mistral 7B is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Sonar accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 8K.
  • Mistral 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral 7B and Sonar specifications
Mistral 7BSonar
ProviderMistral AIPerplexity
Noometry Index23.038.5
Released2023-09-272024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window8K128K
Max output8K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.25$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$1
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
BigCodeBench Instruct19.5%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1082—
BigCodeBench Complete27.3%—
HumanEval+36%—
MBPP+42.1%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1067—
DTBench42.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Adversarial NLI47.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard56.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index112.21—
HellaSwag81%—
LiveBench—46.9%
PIQA83%—
WinoGrande75.3%—

Math Sonar leads

Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.3%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1085—
MATH Level 53.7%—
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
GPQA Diamond15.2%—
LMArena Expert1036—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.6%—
BoolQ87.4%—
MMLU62.5%—
OpenBookQA79.8%—
TriviaQA75.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
LMArena Non-English1012—
LMArena Chinese1009—
LMArena French1037—
LMArena German987—
LMArena Japanese878—
LMArena Russian1018—
LMArena Spanish1026—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1060—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
LMArena Longer Query1060—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral 7BSonar
LMArena Text1090—
LMArena Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1062—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral 7B better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index. Mistral 7B costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral 7B or Sonar?

Mistral 7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Mistral 7B or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 26.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar does, with 128K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral 7B and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral 7B has 37 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper