Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 23.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.1

Rank #345 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Sonar leads 52.6 to 25.4.
  • GPT-3.5-turbo is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Sonar accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 16K.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Sonar specifications
GPT-3.5-turboSonar
ProviderOpenAIPerplexity
Noometry Index23.137.8
Released2023-03-012024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window16K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.50$1
Results tracked447

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.5 (#326), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
WeirdML3.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1137—
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.3 (#328), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1108—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.48—
ForecastBench50.4—
LiveBench—46.9%
WinoGrande81.6%—

Math Sonar leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.0 (#321), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1142—
MATH Level 515.9%—
GSM8K57.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#298), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
GPQA Diamond28%—
LMArena Expert1070—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%—
BoolQ87%—
MMLU71.4%—
OpenBookQA86%—
TriviaQA85.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.6 (#253), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
LMArena Non-English1108—
LMArena Chinese1075—
LMArena French1117—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Russian1123—
LMArena Spanish1120—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 58.1 (#257), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1119—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#249), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
LMArena Longer Query1121—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.4 (#300), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboSonar
LMArena Text1125—
LMArena Creative Writing1092—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—
LMArena Multi-Turn1117—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 23.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5-turbo or Sonar?

GPT-3.5-turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 23.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar does, with 128K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper