Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 25.7.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
  • Ministral 8B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Ministral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index28.237.3
Released2024-10-012026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output262K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$1.11
Results tracked175

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
LMArena Coding1202—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1191—
DTBench45.7%—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond27.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1170—

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1165—
LMArena Chinese1193—
LMArena Russian1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1161—

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1212—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1191—
LMArena Creative Writing1175—
LMArena Multi-Turn1166—

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Step 3.7 Flash?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

Is Ministral 8B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper