Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 12.8.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Llama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
ProviderMetaStepFun
Noometry Index28.837.3
Released2024-04-182026-05-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$1.11
Results tracked315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
ALE-Bench—694.12
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BStep 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper