Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 39.6 to 12.6.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.15 input and $0.15 output per million tokens.
  • Ministral 8B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Ministral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index28.242.3
Released2024-10-012026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output262K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.30
Results tracked1719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding12021436

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11911411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
DTBench45.7%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math11881408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert11701421
GPQA Diamond27.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English11651385
LMArena Chinese11931447
LMArena Russian11951385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11611385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query12121402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text11911403
LMArena Creative Writing11751357
LMArena Multi-Turn11661405

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Step 3.5 Flash?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash lists at $0.10 and $0.30.

Is Ministral 8B or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 8B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Step 3.5 Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper