Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Ministral 8B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.8 to 12.6.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 28.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1202 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1191 |
| DTBench | — | 45.7% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.9% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1170 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1195 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1161 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1212 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1166 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Ministral 8B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Ministral 8B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Ministral 8B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.