Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Mistral Small 3.2

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

27.8

Rank #321 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

30.8

Rank #271 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3.2 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.8 to 12.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.1% for Ministral 8B and 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0938 / $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
Ministral 8BMistral Small 3.2
ProviderMistral AIMistral AI
Noometry Index27.830.8
Released2024-10-012025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K256K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$0.10$0.25
Results tracked176

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Coding1202—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1191—
DTBench45.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—131.73

Math Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30.3%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond27.1%49.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1170—

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1165—
LMArena Chinese1193—
LMArena Russian1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1161—

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1212—

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Text1191—
LMArena Creative Writing1175—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1255
LMArena Multi-Turn1166—

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Mistral Small 3.2?

Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 lists at $0.0938 and $0.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper