Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Mistral Small 3.2
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Small 3.2 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 18.1 to 8.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 33.3% for GPT-4.1 nano and 40.4% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Small 3.2 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | 40.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | 131.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | 30.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Mistral Small 3.2 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 49.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | — |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 nano lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.