Model comparison
Ministral 3B vs Qwen-14B
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Ministral 3B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 26.6.
Side by side
| Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-10-01 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1071 |
Reasoning Qwen-14B leads
Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.1 | 113.03 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| DTBench | 51.7% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| MATH Level 5 | 14.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 25.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Ministral 3B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Ministral 3B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Ministral 3B better than Qwen-14B?
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Ministral 3B and Qwen-14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Ministral 3B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.