Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Sonar

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 52.6.
  • MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and Sonar specifications
MiniMax-M3Sonar
ProviderMiniMaxPerplexity
Noometry Index43.838.5
Released2026-06-012024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M128K
Max output512K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Results tracked417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1469—
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
SimpleBench45.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1447—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.95—
ForecastBench61.4—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1429—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
LMArena Expert1461—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
LMArena Vision1253—
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1426—
LMArena Japanese1381—
LMArena Korean1372—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
LMArena Longer Query1445—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Sonar
LMArena Text1433—
LMArena Creative Writing1404—
EQ-Bench 41150—
LMArena Multi-Turn1442—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Sonar?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Sonar?

MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is MiniMax-M3 or Sonar better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper