Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Sonar

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 52.6.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • GLM-5V-Turbo accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Sonar specifications
GLM-5V-TurboSonar
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Perplexity
Noometry Index43.838.5
Released2026-04-012024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Output $ / M tokens$4$1
Results tracked197

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena WebDev1401—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1466—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LiveBench—46.9%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1441—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena Expert1452—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1488—
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Russian1431—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1423—

Long Context Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena Longer Query1438—

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboSonar
LMArena Text1437—
LMArena Creative Writing1416—
LMArena Multi-Turn1432—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Sonar?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Sonar better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5V-Turbo does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper